If you believe Dr. Ford and not Judge Kavanaugh, what evidence has convinced you of his guilt?

Be specific as to the evidence that has been presented.

Was it the corroboration from the witnesses she named?

Was it her impeccable memory of the incident and the consistent way she's told the story, named locations, and given dates?

Was it how she mentioned the assault years ago in therapy and named Judge Brett Kavanaugh as her assailant, on record, and has provided verifiable proof that she's always said it was him?

Or was it because a woman made a claim against a political figure you don't like and facts don't matter as long as you get your way?

Politically speaking, I have no clue what to make of the Kavanaugh vs Ford testimony. What about you guys?

From Ford's angle, legend has it she was holding off until a Republican like Romney or Trump won the Presidency and spoke out if Kavanaugh ever was selected.

Sure, sexual harassment isn't ever OK, but why wasn't any of this taken into account long before Kavanaugh worked his way up the ranks of our Judicial system?

For being a Ph. D, Ford isn't very smart,

But as for Kavanaugh, he is plenty qualified and I get the whole boys will be boys mentality. He was a cocky student and that's what most success stories were like back then.

35 years pass and here we're. Grassley and Hatch didn't care about the Hill testimony against Justice Thomas. Which is why I'm tempted to say that Kavanaugh may also be appointed and confirmed with no issues from those guys,

but then again in the MeToo era it would be a huge burn for someone who MIGHT have a background of sexual misconduct (not proven just implied) as an arbiter of the law for the rest of his life.

That's the issue. You don't say it's about law and order when Trump candidates bend the rules and push their luck with the public.

I'm not taking sides on this. Lost.

Long story short, I'd like to see where y'all are at in these events.