Is Brat Kavanaugh's calendar stronger evidence than Blasey Ford's polygraph tests?

Is Brat Kavanaugh's calendar stronger evidence than Blasey Ford's polygraph tests?

Added (1). An experienced prosecutor could impeach him as a witness in a trial by asking him about what boofing and devil's triangle mean, because he had lied about those 2 things.

Yes, written journals are admissible as evidence, lie detector tests are not.

We know nothing about her polygraph test or what the 2 question were. LOL

His calendar makes him cry, especially when his dad went over his calendar at Christmas. Seemed such a tender moment, reminiscing with dad even though his dad was sitting in the first row during the hearing. Just think if he turned around and asked dad what he did last week? The whole place would be looking for tissue

There's no evidence

No.

One was written in his own hand at the time of the 'supposed' offense. The other is evidence 'contrived' 30 years after the fact by passing a test that measures only whether a person is inventing fabrications while answering questions now. When events themselves are so far removed from the present and obscured by 'memory lapses' that any answer could be perceived as 'true' and requires no additional fabrications, the test itself becomes meaningless. The person doesn't have enough 'certain facts' to even lie about them or not lie about them. That isn't actual 'TRUTH.' That is like choosing the 'Not applicable' option on a questionnaire and calling it 'truth telling.'

So you tell me.

Yes, considering they only asked two non-specific questions that mattered.

FYI: Ted Bundy passed four times. Most serial killers can pass

Go Kavanaugh!
Ford can't even remember what day she took the polygraph, and it was just a couple months ago… Also, there's a reason why polygraphs are NOT submittable in court… They're unreliable.

I'm sure he was gonna enter 2nd attempt at raping failed at jen's party tonight

No. Her test is not admissible in court as I understand it. No polygraph test is considered reliable enough to admit to court. His calendar certainly is not legal evidence either. If people can Corroborate what his calendar says- say coaches or someone with an impulse snapshot of him standing at some location with a credible indication of the date that happens to be in the photo's background then his calendar is useful. Same with Ford- her test is useful id she can find someone to come forward and confirm as a witness that they were there or they heard or saw something. Neither of these is considered evidence but could guide investigators in who to talk to about what.