Why would anyone think Christine Ford's allegations against Brett Kavanaugh are credible?
Obviously her story was rehearsed and designed so that there was no way any detail of her story could be verified.
Cons are all about protecting criminals
Only liberal idiots bought into that smear campaign
"I like beer" -Brett Kavanaugh
She did not produce one tiny speck of evidence and her story was vague and full of inconsistencies. Her timing with the false allegations however was impeccable.
She passed a polygraph. Kavanaugh refused. All things being equal, the polygraph weights the scale in her favor.
They're not.
They are credible because Brat the Rat collaborated some of it. Brat for example admits that he was at the beach during summer and he admits that he drank a lot. Both of these details were found in Ford's testimony.
There was nothing obvious then, or now, regarding her not being credible.
Ask Trump. He said that she came across as credible.
To bad trump blocked the FBI from interviewing her or kavanaugh or anyone involved, now we will never know.
- If lying to the FBI is a crime why does Dr. Christine Blasey Ford want to talk to them but Brett Kavanaugh doesn't? - 1 If lying to the FBI is a crime why does Dr. Christine Blasey Ford want to talk to them but Brett Kavanaugh doesn't?
- If Kavanaugh did commit the assault against Christine Ford, why didn't he claim that it was a consensual act? In many cases of harassment, the culprit tries to claim that it was a consensual relationship. Since Kavanaugh never did so, does this indicate that he was innocent?