Who has the burden of proof? Ford or Kavanaugh?

If this were a criminal trial the accuser would have the burden of proof…

but this is no trial…

this is a JOB INTERVIEW. Right?

In job interviews, candidates are routinely disqualified for not being able to prove their innocence.

Added (1). they are routinely disqualified by a standard of "more likely than not" like it is in CIVIL court.

Ford.

Ford.

"Routinely disqualified for not being able to prove their innocence"?

While a company is not bound to "innocent until proven guilty", I find your claim highly unlikely.

The accuser is responsible for proving his or her claim.

Ford
Kavanaugh has a history of addictive behaviors and a criminal disregard for the law

Kavanaugh has a slew of character witnesses supporting him who actually know him called references. Ford does not. In a job interview, the one with stellar references would get the job.

In American law, the accuser. In the gestapo-mentality of the left, the accusation must be disproved. That being impossible (a negative can't be proven) they simply level a false charge and condemn.

But we know this is all contrived by Democrats who learned to lie by the Russians.

Stop the Kavanaugh accusations, it's a bunch of BS!

The fact that he perjured himself during the hearings indicates that he can't be trusted with the truth, and this is just another statement on his character and one more reason, of many, that he needs to be disqualified.