When people keep saying that Ford's testimony is credible what exactly are they basing that on?
She have provided no testimony and her letter is vague as sh*t.
It is likely no more than a partisan response. LOL
They'll say anything they can to keep Kavanaugh from being put on the Supreme Court. To the liberals, it doesn't matter if it's true. It doesn't matter if false claims can ruin someone's life - as long as they get their way. I'm not saying it didn't happen because I don't know - and unlike those claiming he's guilty, I'm ok with saying I don't know.
They know she's lying. They just don't want Kavanaugh confirmed.
She has provided a statement as to what happened.
When she testifies to Congress, that will be testimony.
She has nothing to gain. Her life has been upended. Besides, she has named a witness: Mark Judge.
Since every girl in the eighties got drunk and made out with drunk boys, the experience of being felt up over their clothes was not unusual, in fact most women report similar experiences.
I wonder why this psychology professor finds it so hard to move on from being felt up 35 years ago when every other woman barely remembers school days.
Why would you want a proven liar confirmed to the Supreme Court. And why are they pushing to get him confirmed in such a hurry.
Consider Kavanaugh's weak defense. His only defense is to produce women who said they don't think he is a molester. If that's a defense, then any criminal can get off by producing people who will say "He never did anything to me, so I can't see how this guy could possibly be a criminal."
The #metoo "movement" that says all accusers should be believed
We live in the MeToo era when victims are listened to and not victimized again by being accused of lying for coming forward to report sexual assault. In a recent poll only 5% of women support voting on Kavanaugh's nomination without further investigation.
The request is not to vote against confirmation, the call is to investigation.
So lets see if you are true to your word about credibility. If Michael Jackson were still alive, since his accusers were not considered credible by a Jury and he was acquitted of all charges, would you hire him as a babysitter? How about Casey Anthony, also acquitted of all charges of killing her baby, would you hire her?
Why do you think that a person should receive a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS if these allegations are not investigated? If you wouldn't hire Michael Jackson don't expect Senators that respect women enough to listen to their stories, to approve the hiring of Kavanaugh to the court.
- Why do people keep saying that Ford's testimony was credible? Fact: The witnesses she gave do not corroborate any of her story. Fact: She can't remember even basic details of when or where. Fact; She lied to the committee about not being able to appear on Monday because of a fear of flying. Please inform me which of these fact you disagree with and why. Otherwise you are just deflecting.
- Why did Trump say of Dr. Ford: I thought her testimony was very compelling, looks like a very fine woman and was a very credible witness? I thought her testimony was very compelling, and she looks like a very fine woman to me. A very fine woman. It was incredible. It was an incredible moment, I think, in the history of our country. But certainly she was a very credible witness. She was very good in many respects. https://www.c-span.org/video/?452222-1/president-trump-reacts-calls-delaying-vote-kavanaugh-nomination
- What are the MAIN REASONS that people are so interested in the Ford vs Kavannaugh testimony? I don't get it. People are just crazy about this story, I could not care less. I don't see what the big deal is. Is I the sex allure of the story? (but even then this happened back during the early 80s when they were like teeny boppers? Who cares?) he could even come up with a ruling to kick all these illegals out of the country? Do you think he would?
- Libs keep saying the FBI needs to investigate Kavanaugh but what is there to investigate? Ford has already named witnesses and none of them know what she is talking about. What other "evidence" could there possibly be 36 years later for an incident where no sex or injuries or property damage occurred?