Given that there's NO evidence that anything Ford said is true, do we still have to tiptoe around and pretend to believe she is a victim?
Given that there's NO evidence that anything Ford said is true, do we still have to tiptoe around and pretend to believe she is a victim?
Says people like you.
No evidence that what she has said is untrue, is there?
You don't have to do anything.
Well… OK… She might be. But as long as she's firing at him and all of us, it's fair to fire back. I'd totally let it drop if she did though.
I will believe her no matter what. Maybe you should should stop being a misogynist and start always believing women!
She needs to be arrested. #himtoo.
Have you heard the Crissy impersonation? Libs have tried to suppress it, but it is spot on. If you listen to it, YOU are a victim.
Libs will be milking this cow long after it's dead.
I know you find this hard to believe but testimony is evidence. She most certainly was more credible than Kavanaugh. Many people are in jail serving time based on testimony.
- Why so many people believe Christine Ford's story when nobody she named knows what she is talking about and there are? So many details missing AND the timing is very suspicious? Is it that people "believe" her mostly because they WANT to believe her as a way to get back at Trump and stop his agenda?
- What's the difference in the level of the errors, here? Obama said there were 57 States and that Ford invented the automobile. Trump said? Airports instead of seaports or just ports. It looks like the same basic thing. Slip of the tongue. How can libs make such a big deal out of one without seeing that the other is almost identically the same kind of error? .
- If Graham is so upset about people making charges without evidence then why is he accusing Ford of lying without any evidence and the DNC? "putting her up to it" with no evidence for that claim either? Privately? Why? These are public hearings and a lifelong appointment. If somebody's going to speak up they'd better do it now.
- End result of the Ford testimony will be he said/she said with no evidence. So, who gets the benefit of the doubt? Do liberals throwing unsubstantiated mud always get to win? Unless, of course, the next telling of her story varies quite a lot from what we have heard so far.