After considering Ford's testimony for a week, which of the following is most likely true?

1. Everything she said is true, even though not one person she claims could corroborate her story can do so. Nobody she claims was there, has any idea what she is talking about, even her best friend.
But she is still telling the truth.

2. She unconsciously "dreamed" the entire incident and can't tell reality from that dream. That explains how she would remember specific details, as they were the details actually in the dream. She does not remember how she got to the party or where it was or how she got home because that was not in the dream.

3. As a good campus liberal, she was attempting to submarine the nomination by making up and giving a confidential story. She just wanted to raise doubt in the committee. The dems knew the story was weak and did not even present it to the committee. But later those same dems determined that they could manipulate the media and get their easily manipulated constituents into the streets by leaking the story. After after the dems leaked her story it got out of hand.

Added (1). I think that the body of evidence makes number 1 unlikely.

I think that as you combine this with the lies about "two exits" from the house story (where she actually was running a business with a separate entrance) and the "I'm afraid to fly" story, where she flies on vacation often, this starts to skew toward dishonesty and toward number 3.

You've stacked the cards… As they say.

A better question here was "whose lies can be DOCUMENTED"? Answer: Ford's accusations, true or false, can't be, thus far, documented. So that leaves…

She told the story years ago to certain people long before Kavenaugh arrived on the national stage. So something did happen. Was it Kavenaugh? She sure thinks so.

She took and passed a polygraph. Kavanaugh refused a polygraph. All things being equal, I'm rolling with the one who passed the polygraph over the one who refused a polygraph.

4 . She was a trump plant to distract us from kavanaugh's perjury to congress. After a few days of sex allegations we all forgot about his lying to congress

Ford's testimony was supported by the Democrat party o' sex criminals. And should have been dismissed without a hearing, as obviously not true. All accusations of crimes require some proof OTHER than an unsubstantiated accusation.

4 soros hired her

None of the above, something happened to that girl, she is text book, but when one is confused, hasn't worked enough to regain the traumatic event s they can move forward healing from it. Then is also used by a political party, this is the result.