Cadillac(GM) is building an ATS-V. What about you, Lincoln (F)? Planning on building a rival?

I recommend building a 365-hp, 3.5L Ford Taurus SHO V6-powered, all-wheel-drive MKZ SVT to take on Cadillac's new 420-hp, rear-drive ATS-V. The ATS-V would also be a V6, but it's gonna be a 3.6.
If the MKZ sells better in terms of monthly sales than the ATS the MKZ SVT should be it! Expect a mid-four-second 0-60-mph time, $55,000+ price tag, and good fuel economy (18+ mpg in the city, 24+ on the highway).Cadillac GM is building an ATS-V. What about you, Lincoln F Planning on building a rival

Lincoln is like Acura. They make so called "luxury" cars but end up getting screwed over as competition is better. Lincoln would NEVER make a SVT version of anything. They are focused on older generation buyers, Cadillac is moving on and selling to younger people(hence the ATS-V, CTS-V, discontinuation of DTS/STS). I say AT MOST 10% of all Lincoln sales are to people under 35. The other 90% are for older people, which is what Lincoln is going after.

Why should I buy a $55k+(lets say $60k after some options) Lincoln MKZ SVT, when I can pick up a BMW 550i for the same money while getting a twin turbo V8 with close to 450hp? The ATS-V is focused on cars like the C63 AMG or M4. A MKZ SVT would look good on paper but it completely different when you compare it.