Mrs. Ford has a perfect memory of an allegation she made, but why nothing else?

A woman walks into a lawters office and says…
Woman: I want to report a sexual assault.
Attorney: OK, when did it happen?
Woman: I don't know.
Attorney: OK, how long ago did it happen?
Woman: I don't Know.
Attorney: OK, where were you when it happened?
Woman: I don't Know.
Attorney: OK, how did you get to where it happened?
Woman: I don't Know.
Attorney: OK, how did you get home from where it happened?
Woman: I don't Know.
Attorney: OK, come back when you have a little more information.
Woman: Never mind, I'll get in touch with the Democrat Feinstein. She'll take of me.

The Deep State did not have time to train her well.

Because this is all made up, she's just another far left nutjob, driven crazy by her chronic but hurt, and desperate to obstruct in any way she can.

Psst Kavanaugh may be investigated by Maryland authorities because Ford was under the age of consent!

Why?

Because it's a false memory, implanted by bad psychotherapy.

Surely you've experienced something similar in a particularly vibrant, realistic dream before. You remember the details of the events of the dream itself perfectly well. But how you got to the place where the events happened, or why you were there, you haven't a clue. Nor does it even cross your mind that you don't know until you tell someone about the dream and they ask those questions.

These false memories are like that. It's an invention of the mind, and the mind did not think to fill in those details at the time.

A liar would simply make those details up. Only someone who honestly believes her memories to be true would continue proclaiming them with these details missing.

So, the woman gets in touch with Fienstein.
Fienstein: OK, who assaulted you?
Woman: I don't know.
Fienstein: OK, let me refresh your memory… I'll bet that it was that Conservative Judge… Brett Kavanaugh.
Woman: OK, I'm now 100% sure about that part.

You're right, there's absolutely no way Brett Kavanaugh could be convicted of a crime based on her testimony, which is why HE IS NOT ON TRIAL FOR ONE.

Because the assault happened 35 years ago and things surrounding it aren't relevant. She remembers the assault because it was traumatic and became seared into her brain. She doesn't remember how she got to the party because who the **** cares. You probably don't remember what you had for lunch three days ago, but she's supposed to remember her travel habits three decades ago?

If you ask people who deal with sexual assault all the time they'll tell you that victims forget details all the time. And thats magnified by the length of time since the attack.

If she is mistaken about everything surrounding the alleged event, why should we have faith her allegation is 100% reliable when nothing else she said was?

How about her "fear of flying"? She has a lot of frequent flier miles for someone with that phobia.