Kavanaugh - Do libs actually have any clue about inductive or deductive reasoning. OR, any other type of rational thought?
I would be very surprised if Ford actually shows up tomorrow.
No, they only know that they must stop BK.
Yes we do, but evidently you repubs don't.
Prepare for a shock, UTI.
About half of them do, but it all goes out the window when reasoning leads them to a conclusion that they don't like.
Where did you study grammar? At Inbred-U, or was it at Illiterate Trailer Park State? Do you have a clue about how to use an ellipsis or an em-dash?
- Why would Ford harbor a grudge when Kavanaugh's mother actually ruled favorably toward her parents, who ended up keeping their home? CLAIM: In a 1996 foreclosure case, Judge Martha Kavanaugh ruled against Ralph and Paula Blasey, thus providing motive for revenge for their daughter Christine against Judge Kavanaugh's son Brett, a Supreme Court nominee in 2018. RATING: False.
- Why did Christine Ford undergo psychotherapy if her request for a second entrance was actually unrelated to the alleged Kavanaugh assault? Were there any marital conflicts with her husband? Was it her personal frustration that inspired her to accuse Kavanaugh?
- Should AG Sessions extend US Marshal protection to Dr. Ford and any other women being threatened for testifying about Judge Kavanaugh? Kavanaugh is receiving protection from the US Marshals. Dr. Ford has to pay for her own protection. This is despicable.
- Libs, so what is the bare minimum proof we should have to ruin Kavanaugh's and Ford's lives? At this point we have a story from a politician, claiming that she heard a story from a constituent, about a possible situation from 35 years ago when everyone was a minor. Is that the kind of proof you want in order to ruin lives, or do you just not care. Whatever it takes, that is what it takes. RESIST at all costs.