How is it possible that Ford was credible except for one fact: who her attacker was?

How is it possible that Ford was credible except for one fact: who her attacker was?

Ford testified that it was Kavanaugh, no doubts, despite what the repulsive Republicans tried to lie about. Kavanaugh's testimony convinced me he did it.

The GOP would have been credible if they issued a subpeona for Mike Judge to testify before Congress

Ford is mentally ill. Why are you calling her credible?

Text book when traumatic events happen in youth and then the repressed memories start to surface. The burying of them is a self protection thing, prevents one from reliving the trauma. As the memories surface they become intertwined with safe events and people, again as self protection. As one digs through the process, the substations are peeled away as the real memories fill in. With how little she still has of the actual event, it would indicate that she has yet to do the work needed to get to the truth. Which means any and all at this point that she is clear on, could be real or substitution. It can't be trusted.

Repressed memories are notoriously unreliable. She can be credible in that "something" happened to her, but that doesn't make the details accurate.

Likely bill cosby slipped her a qualude

Yes, that was stated multiple times. She definitely has trauma and remembers this happening, and says that she didn't know for a long time who her attacker was until she hard Kavanaugh's voice (which was an emotional trigger, I'm assuming). Memories can always be faulty, but she is very sure that it was Kavanaugh.