FBI didn't find collaborating evidence to support Dr Ford's accusation of Kavanaugh and Collins followed facts. Why are libs so upset?
FBI didn't find collaborating evidence to support Dr Ford's accusation of Kavanaugh and Collins followed facts. Why are libs so upset?
If you don't look, how can you find?
Because Trump's swamp is growing and it's destroying America
Kavanaugh is an emotionally unstable alcoholic.
They might have if they had interviewed people who said they wanted to speak with them. Most people don't find anything if they don't look for it.
Limited investigation.total sham
Because they don't understand "collaborating evidence". Ford's lawyer announced the day before the report came out that she had found corroborating evidence. It was not a person at "the party" but somebody that Ford had told about the issue in ~2015. Which means it is pretty much useless data since Ford first mentioned the party in 2010.
The White House ensured that corroborating witnesses were not allowed to be interviewed by the FBI. The "investigation" was designed not to look for corroboration.
They weren't allowed to look for any. Try to keep up.
They need someone to blame for their misery.
They did not get to derail the appointment.
- Why didn't Dianne Feinstein hand over Dr. Ford's letter to the fbi after she received and read it? Christine Ford is calling for an fbi investigation. You'd think she'd be smart enough to send that letter to the fbi, or at least ask Feinstein to do so.
- Libs keep saying the FBI needs to investigate Kavanaugh but what is there to investigate? Ford has already named witnesses and none of them know what she is talking about. What other "evidence" could there possibly be 36 years later for an incident where no sex or injuries or property damage occurred?
- Libs here's your chance' Ms. Ford claimed 4 people were witness to her accusation. Not one of them corroborated anything she claimed? So explain why she should be believed and Kavanaugh shouldn't. And don't forget Judge backed up what Kavanaugh said.
- Is it reasonable to say in the case of Dr. Ford vs Judge Kavanaugh, only provable Facts will suffice. Since Dr. Ford's story keeps? Changing and since she refuses to participate in normal proceedings, her case is Exceptionally weak and I highly doubt it will stand up to scrutiny. If she continues to refuse to be scrutinized, should her claims be rejected?