Doesn't Ford prove that gender differences are real and that in cases like this. Equality is tossed out even when she has no evidence?

Or witnesses

Gender differences are VERY REAL. Only men say otherwise…

YES. If a man were to claim victimhood status without evidence or witnesses, he would be ignored.

The female biases of courts are already well established facts.

"Gender differences are real" Brilliant!
Women are different than men!

But - - in the eyes of the law everyone is innocent until proven guilty

You are making gender-binary claims and are thus a racist/sexist/homophobe!

This is only a comment on equality if you can compare it to something else, a man being in a similar situation and NOT being believed.

Don't get me wrong: I do have problems with this case. I don't know whether he did these things or not. If he did do those things, I don't want him to be a Supreme Court justice but on the other hand, given his other tactics and obvious political leanings, I don't want him to be a justice anyways.

Never-the-less, that an unproven action that is well beyond the statute of limitations should prevent somebody from getting a job… That's a tough one. Remember, if he HAD served time for it, he would definitely have been excluded from many jobs (certainly this one) well after completing that. Unfortunately, you are never completely done paying penance until you are dead.

Of course, if somebody asks him if he did it, he says "no", and then it is proven to most people's satisfaction that he did, I have no problem not confirming him because he lied under oath.

Thing is, there's so much other evidence that he is lying about a variety of things and that doesn't seem to be blocking the process.

Why THIS thing does confuses me.

Because Politics has reached the point where an 'Allegation' is automatic proof, even without Evidence.