Are those who believe Ford without any evidence or witnesses just politically motivated to try anything at this point to slander a good man?
Are those who believe Ford without any evidence or witnesses just politically motivated to try anything at this point to slander a good man?
Added (1). or just gullible
Clearly.
It has nothing to do with Kavanaugh, c0ntard.
If you aren't willing to be a victim of politics, then stay out of it.
Ask Lindsey Graham
When the Senator from California sat on this letter from her for two months I find it to be very politically.
Former SSgt.
What is the difference between that and those who have heard no evidence or witnesses and think Kavanaugh is a "good man" and she is lying? There's no difference between believing him or believing his accusers at this point in the investigation.
A lot of people thought Bill Cosby was a "good man" too.
Yup, if she had ever been serious about her alleged "trauma" she would have charged him after the event supposedly happened. Instead, she decides to do this character assassination 36 years after high school. It's all political. She's a good little lefty.
Let's see- he lied and evaded questions under oath. He was happy to participate in the prosecution of Clinton but now says a sitting president can't be indicted. He doesn't seem to think the Constitution applies to women. He's a gambling addict who rang up huge bills he couldn't pay. Just what about his makes him a "good man" or qualified to impose his will on the rest of us?
When it comes to SEX Crimes, nobody needs no evidence.
It is just His word against Hers, and we know how the courts work.
Hang the accused, and end the worry.
Ex-president Clinton was falsely accused and it took the Senate to let the man continue his good works.
- If this whole thing isn't politically motivated like Ford says? Then why, instead of taking it to the cops, she sits on it for 35 years and then tells some politicians about it in an attempt to stop a SC conformation?
- If Graham is so upset about people making charges without evidence then why is he accusing Ford of lying without any evidence and the DNC? "putting her up to it" with no evidence for that claim either? Privately? Why? These are public hearings and a lifelong appointment. If somebody's going to speak up they'd better do it now.
- How come Sen. Warren had to provide evidence of her past, while Dr. Ford didn't? Aren't we supposed to believe all women no matter what? Isn't physical evidence supposed to be a lower form of proof than a woman's testimony? Couldn't Sen. Warren just have cried a lot in a little-girl voice to prove she's part Native American? It's hilarious that libs can't answer this.
- Christine Blasey Ford says. She has no idea where, when ( not even a year ) but says her witnesses will back her up, now those 4 say? Sorry, Don't know here, never met her. Since grandstanding liberal politicians couldn't wait to get in front of the mic and say she's telling the truth and they believe her, will they now do the same to the witnesses she named who say "nope, never met her"?