Will dems be able to revive the Ford accusations by Monday, or is that yet another exhausted and unsuccessful tactic?
Will dems be able to revive the Ford accusations by Monday, or is that yet another exhausted and unsuccessful tactic?
Feinstein wasn't quick enough with the b/s.
It just Reeks of a setup. Too many blanks in the story. (like Where and When).
Senator DiFi could take a crash course in photoshop this weekend and see if she can produce some pics of Kavanaugh with various farm animals.
They probably have another unnamed accuser stashed-away just for such emergencies…
The accusations never went away, so…
When this goes away, and it will.It is time for the voting age population of America to ask themselves if they will ever again vote for a party that will wheel out unprovable criminality, bellow ground level low tactics and any old smear to win.
It is then time to ask yourself, if a party that is so inclined to use the tactics of deseparation… Why are they so desperate to win. I don't think you would like the answer to that question, and neither would then majority of Americans.
Why don't you like Women?
It isn't just that she waited 30 years to have this memory miraculously recovered from her repression; nor that she waited another 5 or 6 years to say something. It's the BLATANT and UNABASHEDLY OBVIOUS TIMING of dropping it into place exactly when a very well-vetted, properly chosen and processed Supreme Court nominee came up for a confirmation vote. BAM!
Sure, I b'lieve I'll wait a little while. Yep, 37 years oughtta do it! Hows mid September, 2018, you ask?
Great! That'll be just perfect.
Not like it's planned or anything. Besides, the dems can always investigate the guy any legal way they come up with.
- Looks like Christine Ford isn't interested in showing up to the hearing on Monday. Kavanaugh will be. Gee, I wonder why that may be? Anyone who shows up and testifies will be doing so under oath. If Ford and Kavanaugh give two conflicting stories, then one of them has to be lying, and doing so under penalty of perjury. Perhaps the one who does not WANT to show up and testify under oath is the one who would be lying. Wouldn't make much sense for it to happen the other way around, now would it?
- Kavanaugh has a legal background AND is being prepared by top notch lawyers for Monday's interview. Ford has no chance against? Them even if she tells the truth. Is she right to insist on an FBI investigation to support her claims? The SC can do with only 8 justices for a while.
- It's possible Blasey-Ford totally believes what she's saying yet Kavanaugh wan nowhere around. But how are the dems doing that? Roy More's? Accuser, Leigh Corfman (all the rest said they only kissed) must have formed her memory after the fact, as well. That was as out of character for him as these outlandish claims are for Kavanaugh. More's big "sin" was being attracted to 17 & 18 year olds. Not tweens. Seriously. Again: How are they getting people to conjure and shape-shift their memories and pull them outta theirAsses just exactly at the most destructive time?
- If a car causes another car to swerve and spin-out, is it considered hit-and-run if they leave the scene? On the way to work this morning, I saw a Ford truck cut off a smaller car and the poor car spun out in the rain and ended up facing the opposite direction. This caused the traffic to stop because it looked like the vehicle wouldn't start. The ford truck most likely knew he did that but kept going, instead of stopping. He didn't hit the car or any cars at all during the time. If he didn't actually hit anything, is it still considered hit and run? Should he have stopped?