Why is Christine Ford backtracking on her earlier statements. She had previously claimed there were 4 other people at the party?
Now she is saying she doesn't remember how many people were there
There are tons of inconsistencies. Besides, two men have stepped forward and admitted they assaulted her. Why is she still trying to blame Kavanaugh?
She named four other people at the party. That doesn't mean there were only four other people.
Pay attention, naysayer! What Professor Christine Blasey Ford has said so far (on C-SPAN2) is that she can't say there were not more than the four people she remembers, and this was said to CLARIFY the details of her letter. The people that she knew and noted numbered four, and they included two 17-year-old boys she knew from other events: Brett Kavanaugh and Kavanaugh's close friend Mark Judge, both of them very drunk.
Don't twist her words.
I don't know
Four people in the room, four people at the party, what difference does it make?
People who experience a trauma of this sort remember EVERY detail like it happened yesterday. There's nothing fuzzy about it. They know who. They know where. They know when. They know who was there. It is that way with trauma. Where were you on 9/11? What were you doing? Who were you with? What are your memories of that morning? See? There's nothing fuzzy about it. That is why Dr. Ford has no credibility.
- Why so many people believe Christine Ford's story when nobody she named knows what she is talking about and there are? So many details missing AND the timing is very suspicious? Is it that people "believe" her mostly because they WANT to believe her as a way to get back at Trump and stop his agenda?
- Typical lib thinking? Ford had no idea when it happened, had no idea how she got there, no idea how she left, clueless who was there? And despite that every person she listed as a witness made a statement in a sense said Ford was wrong… The lib brain… Get even at Trump…> yep - Kavanaugh did it.
- Libs here's your chance' Ms. Ford claimed 4 people were witness to her accusation. Not one of them corroborated anything she claimed? So explain why she should be believed and Kavanaugh shouldn't. And don't forget Judge backed up what Kavanaugh said.