Why are Cons complaining about Ford when they personally invited all of Clinton's no-evidence accusers to sit behind Hillary during?

Their ginned up Benghazi hearings?

Added (1).… Or maybe that was their ginned up email accusations.

Added (2).… Sorry it was the debate. What a slimy good for nothing tactic by the GOP.

I'm sure Hillary was saying, "What difference does it make?"

A more skilled propagandist would not go down the road of W. Clinton's sex crimes. However, thank you for reminding us of the difference between Kavanaugh - who has NO actual evidence against him - and Clinton - who not only has mountains of evidence against him but was having to pay damages to his victims. You also remind us of Weiner, Weinstein, etc.

Hillary misappropriated 'party' funds to pay for the attacks on the victims of the sex criminal in chief. Joe then makes the claim that Carville works for free. So campaign contributions violations then.

That makes no sense at all

Conservative hatred of the Clinton family knows no bounds

Ginned up? You mean there never was a Benghazi Incident?
. Why are Cons complaining about Ford when they personally invited all of Clinton s no-evidence accusers to sit behind Hillary during