When a liberal says something like Ford has a lot of evidence on her side, why don't they ever list the evidence they are talking about?

When a liberal says something like Ford has a lot of evidence on her side, why don't they ever list the evidence they are talking about?

Like Mulder would say, they want to believe it?

Liberals are under no obligation to reveal evidence to be presented in a courtroom. LOL

The left says a lot of things. It is usually a waste of time to listen. It is either a lie, a fiction or merely wrong.

Ford has no evidence.

Because there's no evedance, forensic or hard evedance does not exsist in her pandered story.

Just the fact that she told friends and also her psychologist and it's part of her medical record.

She has NO evidence but neither does Mueller and the democrats and their media sycophants don't care.

That is confidential. She was scheduled to go before Congress today but someone convinced her to request an FBI inquiry first. That could take months. That didn't happen when Clarence Thomas was accused of sexual misconduct as an adult. This incident was in high school. The people in Congress seem cowardly and should insist of having a hearing about it.

I think it's a nothing burger and it doesn't matter if she doesn't have any evidence, as long as it holds up the confirmation of a supreme court justice seat until after the elections

Let's put Mark Judge under oath and find out.