How much do you think it costs?

A nice ultra modern 2 story Duplex style townhouse.
A Ford Ecosport.
Ashley Furniture.
Sony Electronics
GE Appliances

A loaded bathroom with all the latest hygiene tech gadgets.
And basically a pharmacy… Never worry about anything getting me down.

Organic food.
Real European fashion clothes that really serves my heritage and does its part is making me truly westernized.

A Gym membership.

Sounds like an ordinary life right?

Well.
It isn't.

This is highly expensive.

It's thousands of dollars a month.
Lol

A question for Baby Boomers?

This is a list of what I do for a living.

I Drive for Uber and Lyft.
I Deliver food for Door Dash, Bite Squad and Grub Hub.
I sell Footwear on Amazon and E Bay.
I Sell Snacks and Drinks out of a Shopping Cart.
I do marketing at home through being an Associate for various companies.

It's a lot.
But it works and fits together.

This is what I have.

I have a 3 bedroom rental luxury townhouse with a Garage.
I have a Ford Ecosport.
I have fashion Clothing from Dillards.
I have Work Clothes from Wrangler workwear.

I have Ashley Furniture.
I have Sony Electronics.
I have Apple computers.

I have organic groceries from Whole Foods.

I have a Labrador, and two Abyssinians.
And 20 Clownfish.

Here's my question.

Why do I get so much criticism for what I do for a living…

And.
Why should I do something for a living that you STILL run, trapped in your trickle down economics…

When Most of what I do.
Is about the new economy based on the internet and digital service?

And is providing me with the good life that you have?

I understand that people need doctors and lawyers. Of course…
But the fact is, is that you dominate these sectors of the market.

I have bills today.

Why didn't California consult GM and Toyota when they created stricter emissions standards?

Why did they only consult Ford, Volkswagen, Honda, and BMW? Now the justice department is conducting anti-trust investigations on this issue?

How is this "bullying auto companies?" On page 11 of the NYT, governor Newsom is quoted. He claim Trump has been bullying auto companies for months. How so?

The NYT claims that the four auto-companies displeased Trump in some way. They seem to imply that Trump is wantonly attacking them. Why does the creative NYT writer believe this? What basis is there to believe Trump is wielding arbitrary authority against Ford, Volkswagen, Honda, and BMW?

For the sake of argument, suppose the NYT's character assassinating accusation is correct. Shouldn't they at least state reasons why Trump is targeting four auto-companies? Even then, it's just speculating.

Why is the NYT trying to depict Trump as a villain? On this specific issue, what basis is there to do so? Is it fair to say that the writers of this article have low journalistic standards? Do they even have a conscious?

The most glaring omission was that Toyota and GM weren't even mentioned in the article. Toyota is the largest Japanese automaker. GM is the largest domestic auto maker. Isn't it odd they weren't even mentioned?

Not one single statement is made as to the possible merits of an anti-trust investigation. It's as though it's assumed Trump is capable of nothing but malicious intent.

My first car was a 2003 Ford Excursion XLT?

When I turned 16 and first got my license.
The other teenagers at the time were afraid of larger veicles, saying that they're too powerful, they're too high up, they're hard to control…

So being the gutsy guy that I was…
And by that time, tough as a bed of nails, with teeth.

I figured I would do something different.

Of course I never accounted for such a vehicle also being an inefficient, expensive gas guzzler…

I got myself a Ford Excursion XLT.

To me, that was really fun to drive.
Up high, 10 Cylinders, 310 HP…
10,000 pounds of maximum recommended towing.
Back then, that was very powerful.

I liked the truck like handling.

It felt like when I climbed up in it…
I strapped on a mean piece of equipment.
Lol

I really felt bad that I had to sell it because of the fuel consumption…

Back when gas hit $4 per gallon under Bush.

That vehicle did help launch me as a truck driver.
:P

Do you need circumstantial evidence to prove you stole something?

I inherited a 1942 Ford gpw vehicle that is all there and original from my grandad that's had it since the 1960s and it doesn't have a title but it sat for a while in my back yard under a barn but I'm afraid someone might have looked at the VIN on the gpw and remembered it and registered it under his or her name. Antique cars do not require titles in Arkansas and that's where i live at. What if someone remembered the VIN on your 80 year old car that never left your property and registered it before you and then they reported it stolen. Would they have to have circumstantial evidence to prove your guilty?