Libs: If Christine Ford is unwilling to repeat her claims under oath, what does that tell you?
As you are not charged with perjury if you tell the truth, there's only one thing it CAN tell you.
The FBI must investigate first. That way, Congress can determine if her testimony corroborates the findings of the investigation.
It tells me she doesn't want to commit perjury. LOL
She past a polygraph test already. She's telling the truth.
That republicans threatened her, perhaps one of Trumps staff did.
LOL libs cry FBI,… LMAO
there's no suggestion of a federal crime, quite apart from the statute of limitations issue. So the FBI has no independent authority to open a criminal investigation.
The confirmation is a sham.
That question is already answered. She wants to repeat them to the FBI, and lying to them is a felony, AND under oath to congress afterward. Sounds like someone who's telling the truth. The consequences would be horrible for her if she got her wish and then lied to the FBI.
Further proof this whole thing is a false accusation.
She " demanded to be heard ", now that a hearing is scheduled, she's got nothing to say?
She doesn't want to lie under oath
- Why is it mocking Ford to repeat/paraphrase her words? She does not know any details. How is it mocking her to point that out? Where were you? "I don't know". When? "I don't know"… If those word are so offensive, why were they used? Why is it so offensive to point to her own testimony?
- Ford said under oath that she didn't know the Senate Judiciary Committee offered to interview her in California. Her attorney wrote? To the committee before her testimony: "Dr. Ford has asked me to let you know that she appreciates the various options you have suggested". Who is lying Ford or her attorney or both?