Judge Kavanaugh - Is it true that his mother as local MD judge in 1996 ruled negatively against Prof Fords parents in a home forclosure case?
If it is (which I heard tonight)… Sure speaks volumes!
There's a list
yes it is a thing.
Also pro choice is her work.
How does what his mother did speak volumes about anything concerning Mr. Kavanaugh. To be honest with you I could care less about his becoming a Supreme Court Justice one way or the other but the actions of a parent in no way impact upon their offspring.
No, His mother actually voted favorably in that case and they ended up keeping the house, shame her idea of gratitude is to falsely accuse Kavanaugh of sexual assault.
Once they dismiss these allegations, I sure hope she gets punished for making false claims.
Nope.
More right-wing propaganda fake news.
There was a 1996 foreclosure case involving Martha Kavanaugh and Dr. Blasey's parents. But the Blaseys settled with their bank, and Judge Kavanaugh DISMISSED THE CASE.
Judge Kavanaugh's ruling ALLOWED the Blaseys TO KEEP THEIR HOME.
don't believe FOX news, Gateway Pundit, Alex Jones or Storm Front.
Not true. In fact, the mortgage lender and Fords reached a settlement, and the case was dismissed at the request of the lender. There was no foreclosure.
Where did you hear that?
You know that Fox news spreads false rumors.
And don't ask US if this is true. Go to that jurisdiction and look up the Court records for yourself.
No. She actually ruled in a way that was favorable to Ford's parents.
Yes
- Why would Ford harbor a grudge when Kavanaugh's mother actually ruled favorably toward her parents, who ended up keeping their home? CLAIM: In a 1996 foreclosure case, Judge Martha Kavanaugh ruled against Ralph and Paula Blasey, thus providing motive for revenge for their daughter Christine against Judge Kavanaugh's son Brett, a Supreme Court nominee in 2018. RATING: False.
- Why did dr.fords case go straight to a live public congress hearing? Local police investigation where the alleged incident took place? Nah lets skip that fbi investigation to establish what really happened? Nah lets skip that lets go straight to a live public congress hearing just to decide to get the fbi to investigate the accussed ( for a 7th time in his career) anyone would think this whole episode was politically motivated to harm republicans in the mid terms and nobody really cared to learn the truth of it
- Is it reasonable to say in the case of Dr. Ford vs Judge Kavanaugh, only provable Facts will suffice. Since Dr. Ford's story keeps? Changing and since she refuses to participate in normal proceedings, her case is Exceptionally weak and I highly doubt it will stand up to scrutiny. If she continues to refuse to be scrutinized, should her claims be rejected?