Isn't it strange that the same people who demanded proof that Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, don't need any when it comes to claiming that a?
Dem is sending the bombs to swing the midterms?
Its only strange to you because you're a liberal
you lack to the ability to think critically or logically
No, it's typical. I'm sure the Pharisees thought they were doing the right thing too.
They're the biggest hypocrites ever.
They're worms
Yep. Welcome to the illogical GOP.
- Who has the burden of proof? Ford or Kavanaugh? If this were a criminal trial the accuser would have the burden of proof… but this is no trial… this is a JOB INTERVIEW. Right? In job interviews, candidates are routinely disqualified for not being able to prove their innocence. they are routinely disqualified by a standard of "more likely than not" like it is in CIVIL court.
- What Ford vehicles with a 302 motor comes with a 4 barrel carb (and only comes 302 with a 4bc)? I have a 1989 mustang gt motor and I'm making it carbureted and I'm looking for any vehicle with a 302 that carries a 4b. I'm going to a junkyard where they don't help with finding vehicles, so it would be helpful to know what vehicles only have a 302 with a 4bc, that way I can look it up on the website and know exactly where its at.
- Libs, so what is the bare minimum proof we should have to ruin Kavanaugh's and Ford's lives? At this point we have a story from a politician, claiming that she heard a story from a constituent, about a possible situation from 35 years ago when everyone was a minor. Is that the kind of proof you want in order to ruin lives, or do you just not care. Whatever it takes, that is what it takes. RESIST at all costs.