Interesting how Ms. Ford claimed that she had 4 other people with her at this party 36 years ago. Every single person, including her best?
Friend, do not remember this party or that there was not even a party? One person who says I don't recall the location or time of the party, but she is certain that there was a party, and 4 people do not remember this party or say that there was no party at all.
Now not one single person can corroborate her story, and she is clueless about the time and place of this fantasy party that took place in her deranged head.
If anyone believes Ms. Ford they are either lying or they are lacking a functioning brain.
Democrats you are on, give us all a great explanation for this ridiculous lie Ms. Ford has told us while under oath?
She also apparently originally (in 2012) claimed the incident happened in the summer of 1984 when she was 17. The Left had to change the year to 1982 (making her 15) when they found out Kavanaugh was not in Maryland for the summer of 1984. That is also why she says she is uncertain regarding when it occurred, so she has a defense against perjury.
I believe the Left has made a HUGE strategic error by using these blatantly fake allegations against Kavanaugh in their effort to prevent the USSC from becoming solidly conservative. People who normally vote conservative but who might not have been very motivated to vote in November are now highly motivated.
No actually it's not interesting at all. In fact, it's very boring.
Kavanaugh's own calendars say that there were parties. You think kids at Georgetown Prep didn't have parties? How gullible are you?
This claim of yours simply is not true.
I would know if I was kavanaughed and by whom without all the other details.
Actually she claims five people total. Brett and Judge were two. Ford makes 3. But she says she went downstairs she saw "other persons" talking to Brett and Judge. There could have only been 2 other people. Since when does 5 make a party? Who refers to the other 2 as "other persons".
Why would they remember? As Dr Ford mentioned in her testimony she wouldn't expect any of them to remember it because nothing eventful happened to them at the party. Do you remember every party you went to 35 years ago? I don't.
But her memory seems to be corroborated by Kavanaugh himself. His calendar has an entry, I believe for July 1st, which shows him going to a party with three of the four people who Ford says were at the party where she was assaulted.
Her story has no corroboration, while Kavanaugh's has multiple people willing to testify in order to exonerate him. This is not serious, not nearly so much as the Thomas hearing nearly 30 years ago. What the Senate is doing here is worse than McCarthyism and to its great discredit.
- What is leftist icon Christine Ford up to these days? Is she still making up lies about people touching her 35 years ago? Or did she just take the money, and run? ANON- so people donated money to her because she was "assaulted", and she in turn donates that same money to people who were assaulted?
- Typical lib thinking? Ford had no idea when it happened, had no idea how she got there, no idea how she left, clueless who was there? And despite that every person she listed as a witness made a statement in a sense said Ford was wrong… The lib brain… Get even at Trump…> yep - Kavanaugh did it.
- Libs here's your chance' Ms. Ford claimed 4 people were witness to her accusation. Not one of them corroborated anything she claimed? So explain why she should be believed and Kavanaugh shouldn't. And don't forget Judge backed up what Kavanaugh said.
- Did Brett Kavanaugh just corroborated things Blase-Ford could not have known years ago or even months ago? 1. That Kavanaugh was drunk since Kavanaugh admitted he drank beer and liked beer when he was a teenager 2. That Kavanaugh was at a party with girls on weekends, since he admitted that he was partying on weekends with girls.