In Kavanaugh V Ford Does Presumption of innocence mean the Accuser is not to be believed until her case is proven?
In Kavanaugh V Ford Does Presumption of innocence mean the Accuser is not to be believed until her case is proven?
Added (1). Is this a difficult question to answer?
Not if you are Democrat nor typical Fake News editorial syndicate.
Yes, that is exactly what it means. It means her testimony is weighed for its credibility and given its proper weight in court. Ford's credibility is a rotten-tire-fueled dumpster fire. So yeah, Kavanaugh is innocent until proven guilty against a CREDIBLE accuser.
Against Ford… He's just innocent and she's a political hose beast trying to hide the fact that she doesn't remember WHO assaulted her, if anyone, because she was too drunk and too promiscuous to be able to tell one from another throughout the 80s.
It is not a criminal trial. I may be a chance to contrast the Democratic lifestyle with the Trump style.
Not to worry the demacrats will pay another to accuse him.
If it was a criminal trial, then there would be no way I could consider voting to convict him on the evidence I saw - but if it was a case of judging someone for the top job he wants, I'm not so sure. On balance of probabilities, I think something untoward did happen there
- What actually happened to innocent until proven guilty? Kavanaugh is clearly the victim of a smear campaign. There's no evidence to support fords fairytale in fact all the witnesses completely deny it ever happened. Does it not scare you that there's so many Americans willing to belie her simply on the words of the democrats. Is their grip really that tight on you?
- Should Ford be studied for her ability to not remember details about her trauma after 13,000 days. But after 6 days with her lawyer? Her memory during her drunken stupor becomes crystal clear? Could Ford's techniques be used with alzheimer's patients, the elderly, and other drunks who experienced "black outs?"
- Regarding Brett Kavanaugh, whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? People have been verbally slaughtering him and he hasn't been found guilty of anything. And no, the republicans haven't been stifling anything. Dianne Feinstein did stifle, though, when she sat on this letter from Christine Blasey Ford for 6 weeks. You'd think that she'd think that letter would be important to the FBI in vetting Kavanaugh. But nope! She drops this at the 11th hour.
- Isn't great the Kavanaugh accuser yearbook shows she not a Angel? https://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html?showComment=1537409523569&m=1#c2260053581059665674