Ford's polygraph report released, says she was telling the truth. Aren't polygraph tests liberally biased?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/christine-blasey-fords-polygraph-report-released
No. They just don't work well period which is why they aren't admissible.
She is a doctorate in psychology. She knows how to beat a polygraph.
If it proves anything it is that she believes that what she is saying is the truth, not that it is factually correct.
No country in the world with a functional judicial system admits polygraph tests into evidence! Having issued that caveat - who's to say she isn't telling the truth anyway! She's now one of THREE women making similar claims
No but they are unrealiable for a reason, especially for events so long ago, the person has had years to normalize reactions, even to trauma.
I have no doubt that a delusional person believes what they say.
The reason why polygraphs are not admissible in court is that they don't work and can't help you tell when someone is lying.
The police will tell you it's an investigative technique. That is they will tell the accused they failed the lie detector test so they might as well confess.
It's a trick cops use on stupid people.
There are valid reasons why polygraphs are inadmissible in court.
Who cares? He touched a boob when he was 18-years-old. That's hardly a felony and allegations of sexual assault are beyond the statues of limitations after 36 years.
- If Blasey-Ford is telling the truth, she could instantly annihilate Kavanaugh with one, short BRAIN-SCAN LIE DETECTOR session. Of course, if? She's lying, she'd be the laughingstock of the century. And these MRI's are very, very accurate. Why won't she just demand they BOTH take one? I mean, since she isn't lying. .
- Christine Blasey Ford says. She has no idea where, when ( not even a year ) but says her witnesses will back her up, now those 4 say? Sorry, Don't know here, never met her. Since grandstanding liberal politicians couldn't wait to get in front of the mic and say she's telling the truth and they believe her, will they now do the same to the witnesses she named who say "nope, never met her"?