Do libs still believe Christine Ford? What evidence do you libs think best corroborates her claims?
Do libs still believe Christine Ford? What evidence do you libs think best corroborates her claims?
Added (1). oikoo- you would convict a man of a felony sex crime based on simply a polygraph?
These are the key pieces of evidence that sexist Republicans are ignoring.
1) She's a woman and we must always believe women (a)
2) The accused is a white male
3) The accused is a Republican
4) Presumption of innocence is sexist
SHE passed a lie-detector test. Kavanaugh didn't. The FBI was constrained by the Republican-dominated committee and did not interview all the people they might have, given sufficient time. They did not find Kavanaugh innocent; they just could not corroborate Dr Ford's allegation in the time allotted.
The democrats know he is innocent. They just wanted to bloc his confirmation, and some democrats have even admitted this.
Please help out the DNC drones by reminding them of who she is, their brains loose the information the DNC central gives them if not repeated every 48 hours.
Some do, but they know it is not a major issue, at this point.
But Ford was believable, Mitchell could not take her apart, and Kavanagh was angry, about being questioned in that hearing at that time.
But the only thing this will do, is well, motivate some libs to vote.
Personally, like Rocky Balboa said to a guy who's thumbs he was told to break, "I ain't emotionally involved."
None she has had a lifetime of psychiatric therapy, although she may believe it happened 100% it's all false memories
Ironically, something that Trump noticed. It's what she says she doesn't remember. The things that Trump said she said she didn't remember are the things that someone telling the truth wouldn't remember -- and that most liars would pretend to remember.
As opposed to believing the equally uncorroborated Kavanaugh lies.
Why don't you prove your point, by meeting with a group of hostile politicians and professional investigators and make up a sexual assault against you -- testify, answer their questions, and share your humiliating story in front of the world. To me, her courage in doing what she did corroborates her claims. No one is able to lie like that in a hostile forum. What the f is wrong with you? The better argument, if you must, is that we can't judge Kavanagh by behavior that he engaged in when he was a teenager.
- Under questioning, Dr Ford said she had no political motivation to come forward. If you believe her, will you raise your hand? I'm going to send you an email detailing how, just for the cost of overnight shipping to Nigeria and attorney's fees, you can finally claim that $10,000,000 inheritance from the long, lost relative of yours who was a much loved Nigerian Prince.
- Libs: If Christine Ford is unwilling to repeat her claims under oath, what does that tell you? As you are not charged with perjury if you tell the truth, there's only one thing it CAN tell you.
- How come Sen. Warren had to provide evidence of her past, while Dr. Ford didn't? Aren't we supposed to believe all women no matter what? Isn't physical evidence supposed to be a lower form of proof than a woman's testimony? Couldn't Sen. Warren just have cried a lot in a little-girl voice to prove she's part Native American? It's hilarious that libs can't answer this.