Are 1949 Chrysler Crown Imperials good cars?

I want to buy an old car where I live and an old man is selling one. It comes stock and it does not have the original seats. The engine is stock as well. It looks fairly in good shape except for a few rust spots(no rust holes). I was wondering if it was a good car to have? I don't know if it starts. I'm not looking to restore it but I could when I get a little money. I was planning on trading a non-running but could be fixed to run 1994 Ford Pickup, a Yamaha 4-wheeler(don't know the year) and a 1919 Ford model T engine for it. Will this be enough to buy it? Is it worth it or am I biting off more than I can chew. BTW, it's my first car if I get it. I love old cars and I want one(1900's to 1950's mostly) or could there be an alternative cheaper old car that some of you guys may have?(1900's-1950's?)

That was Chrysler's top of the line car. If it is complete and runs and isn't entirely oxidized, it's a good car.

Do not buy it, you know nothing about cars. You are in deep water with your nose just above it, and there's a big fat guy on the diving board.

That car is nearly 70 years old. Getting parts for it could be difficult and expensive.

It would be a serious mistake if you think you are going to buy this car and use it as a daily driver. You'll be lucky if it runs at all. And even though you don't want to restore it, you'll spend tons of money getting it running, keeping it running, and good luck on finding even basic parts, even at a junk yard.

The Crown Imperials were the top of the line cars for their day.

If it were me buying it, and I do love old cars too, I think I would have to hear it run, drive it and make sure the transmission still works properly, though if it has been sitting I would recommend changing the transmission filter before you ever put it in gear. Then I would make up my mind as to whether or not I wanted a project car. And yes, a 1949 ANYTHING is a project car.

You will find most engine and transmission parts easily enough, especially if it has the 331 Hemihead and the Pressomatic transmission. Body parts will cost you an arm and a leg. If the chrome needs work you will have to do that yourself and have it re-chromed which isn't real cheap.

The glass would be cheap enough most of it is flat glass.

But, yeah, if I was looking for another project car I would go with an old Chrysler. Especially if I could get my hands on a top-of-the-line one like the Crown Imperial.

But I would not lie to myself and think it was a car that will not need worked on every month.

  • What's with kelly bluebook an NADA prices looking at a 88 crown victoria ford with 107k miles in good shape? The sellers asking 2800 which is 100 dollars over good shape in the NADA Prices. Fair is 1k good is like 1800 an mint is 2800. The seller said he wants 2500 would take 2250 i'm offering 1800 tops for it. Is this a good car to get. Its got a 5.0 v8 looks clean runs good.
  • Ford ranger for 2000 Chrysler Sebring? I have a 98 ford ranger with about 115,000 miles on it. And a friend wants to trade a 2000 Chrysler Sebring with about 167,000 miles on it. Plus maybe $500 bucks. Is this a good deal or no? Exactly how reliable are 2000 Chrysler Sebring's known for being? Any info would be helpful.
  • Doge vs Ford vs Cadillac vs Chrysler? I've recently come into some money and I'm able to buy either a 2005 Mustang, 2005 Cadillac cts, or a 2005 doge challenger, or a 2005 Chrysler 300. They all cost around the same price. But in your opinion what's the better car? I live in Michigan so weather is a concern.
  • Is Mercury Grand Marquis/Ford Crown Vic a good 1st car? Looking for a first car and I'm really interested in a Grand Marquis/Ford Crown Vic and want to know opinions on the car as a 1st car and in general. They seem to be well maintained and used lightly by a generally older crowd. Opinions?